I can almost hear my Grandma (who is no longer with us on earth, but who I am quite sure is standing next to me, reading over my shoulder as I type this), “Beastie Boys? Kids these days and their crazy music. I can’t understand what they’re saying. And they’re always jumping around. Oh for Pete’s sake.” (Insert Minnesotan accent and a frownish expression of annoyance). I don’t mean to make fun of my Grandma. That is actually a quote I heard from her on many occasions. Always with the jumping around. Yeah, I’m pretty sure I had ants in my pants.
My point is, however, that I don’t think the tone of my first post was clear. I mean, I got the meat of my story across . . . I talked about Sarah and her PWR2MCA project. I wanted to highlight this creative idea that encourages people to go take action in something (anything!) they believe in. But after reading it a few times, it felt like I was reading one of the dumbass reports I have to write for work. Factual, informative, and B-O-R-I-N-G. Where’s the pizzazz? Where is my (naturally snarky) voice? Well, it’s a little bit of a conflict to be continually sarcastic and edgy when you’re trying to promote good will, compassion, and bits of Buddha. Or is it? I’m sure His Holiness, the Dalai Lama, can tell a good knock-knock joke or repeat a limerick about a man from Nantucket. Right? Maybe? I hope so.
But here is the other problem. I want to highlight random acts of kindness, charitable causes, and good deeds – yes? Well, how do you talk about cancer walks and AIDS benefits and the anti-human trafficking movement with humor and a little snarky bite? These are serious issues! I think it’s amazing that so many people are out in the world trying to make our planet a better place. It should serve as a daily reminder to the rest of us that it only takes one small effort to make a big difference. I just want to make sure I find the balance between being a cheerleader for compassion and gratitude without sounding like a holier-than-thou, bonnet-wearing Sunday school teacher. Somehow wearing a bonnet seems very goody-goody, à la Laura Ingalls Wilder on her prairie. Although, now that I think about it, Laura never wore her bonnet and got into a lot of trouble over that fact. Not so goody after all. Maybe I should be a little more “Laura” and a little less “Mary” – her allegedly perfect sister. What Would Laura Do?
I’ve actually been going through the last few months saying to myself, “What Would Yauch Do?” But since this is not a Beastie Boys fan site, I feel that sentiment may be lost on most of my audience. Not that a Laura Ingalls reference will make any more of an impact. Hmm . . . I’ve stumbled on an interesting dilemma. Will more of my friends and family relate to Laura Ingalls or Adam Yauch/MCA? God-fearing prairie-girl stubbornness versus rapper-emcee bad boy turned Buddhist?
Grandma? Any thoughts?
Until next time, peace and gratitude. With a little bite.